Missed Opportunities: Athletes Who Couldn't Match Their Superstar Parents

in #hive-10169015 days ago

swimming-pool-gd43fc3c08_640.jpg

source
When we hear of Stephen Curry, or even his younger Brother Seth, many will find it interesting to note that their Father Dell was a former NBA player and known for, you guessed it...His 3-point shooting. The Curry brothers, especially Stephen have managed to surpass their Father's legacy and leave legacies of their own.

As inspiring as this sounds, it is no mean feat in terms of accomplishments. Successful Parents may pass on their genes to offspring's, but it doesn't necessarily come with all the talents and experiences they possessed on their way to success.

Replicating a successful career is a heavy feat to accomplish, and most second generation athletes who follow in the footsteps of their parents simply do not match up. But what is the cause of this though? Shouldn't offsprings of successful parents have a competitive edge in the pathway to success in that given field? I made some observations studying a couple of second generation athletes and came up with some possible reasons:

A Lack of Interest

Muhammed Ali had Nine known Biological Children, but of all of them only one, Laila, took up her father's legacy and ventured into professional boxing.

You would think that a career pathway for anyone with the last name "Ali" would already have been defined by their Father's success. Arguably the greatest boxer of all time and certainly the most Iconic. Surely it would have meant huge returns in terms of commercial success and personal wealth for whichever of them had bothered to thread that path. Especially for the son he named after him, Mohammed Ali Junior, the name alone would have sparked interest from the boxing World irrespective of his achievements.

Laila Ali did eventually go on to be one of the best and definitely the most commercially successful female boxer of her time.

His Counterpart George Foreman even went a step further by naming all his sons after himself in the hope that they would be able to make bank off his name. Only one of them took up boxing, Goerge III, but he did not have a noteworthy career largely because he took up the sport really late and fought no one of interest.

A Lack of Discipline

Boxing again seems to have all the examples as the case of Julio Cesar Chavez Jnr whose Father was renowned for giving a new respect to Mexican prize fighters and is certainly one of the greatest of all time. His shown did show some skill, and even picked up a World title at Middleweight. Although he can be excused for not being as successful as his father given that he didn't pick up the sport early and only had two amateur fights before turning pro, Chavez's Career will best be known for his lack of dedication to the sport, often failing to make weight and not showing the same in-ring resilient spirit as his father.

Commercialization Opportunities

I keep giving boxing as an example because it is easy to sell the offspring of a good prizefighter and get the crowd interested.

However, in a sport like Tennis where commercial opportunities are less about about marketing and more about results, it is a difficult sell. No one will care if you're the child of a Tennis great if you can't crack yourself into prominence in the first place. Getting into such a position requires extreme dedication, discipline as well as skill that simply cannot be developed without a pre-existing passion.

Conclusion

Perhaps society needs to stop putting pressure on the offspring of great athletes to succeed. Notwithstanding, it will remain an opportunity for them to capitalize on such opportunities their parents have created for them.

Sort:  

I feel this situation concerns all fields of life as a lot of people put pressure on their offspring to be a better version of themselves and that in turn hurt the kid's chances of being great in that field as the pressure will likely weigh them down.

As a parent, just support your kid's decision on whatever they want to do and see how happy they will be

in the 21st century it is crystal clear to parent or guardian not to force a child to something he or she is not interested in,..if not they'd fail miserably

more or less allow them find their root path and grow, they must not do what they(parent) did, but they(parent)should help them develop interest in sport at least one...cause at tender age a child's mind is open to learning basically anything whatsoever...

Your content has been voted as a part of Encouragement program. Keep up the good work!

Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform!

Support Ecency
Vote for Proposal
Delegate HP and earn more

It must be a huge pressure to handle and massive expectations... On the positive side though, they will have great opportunities and will get the benefit of the doubt more than randomers when it comes to trials, scouts etc

Interesting topic and one that comes with huge pressure. many offspring fail to match their parents abilities as the drive is not there. If your parents were successful then you are most likely fairly wealthy and the drive is not really there. If my kids wanted to follow myself I would rather they played another sport in which they could make their own name.

Many parents would prefer their kids not go through the difficulties it took to achieve success in their field. Yet for some careers, not taking advantage of the opening a parent provides just seems like a waste....at least commercially.

I for one will go bonkers if any of the Federer twins became superstar players in the future

Yes but a name made in one sport will still be recognised in another if mommy or daddy was a superstar. Doors will open no matter what as everyone knows everyone in the elite circles.

This kind of pressure is counterproductive most of the time. Not only in sports.

@tipu curate